4.8 Article

Worm-like S-doped RhNi alloys as highly efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.039

关键词

Worm-like; RhNi alloy; sulfur doping; Electrocatalysts; Hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21872040]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2016GXNSFCB380002]
  3. Nanning Science and Technology Project [AB16380030]
  4. European Union
  5. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH-CREATE-INNOVATE [T1EDK-02442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precious metals are considered as the most efficient electrocatalysts for boosting the dynamic process of cathode in water electrolysis devices. Due to the large surface areas and the low coordination numbers of surface atoms, their one-dimensional ultrafine nanowires and two-dimensional ultrathin nanosheets are continually being investigated, while stacking problems inevitably affect their activities and stabilities. We describe herein a three-dimensional metal network electrocatalyst consisting of a worm-like S-doped RhNi alloy (S-RhNi), which improves the performance for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Experimental results reveal that S-RhNi exhibits Pt-like HER activity with an onset potential close to 0 mV and a Tafel slope of 24.61 mV dec(-1) in 0.5 M H2SO4 aqueous solution, having also good stability. The polarization curve shifts only 3.9 mV at a current density of - 60 mA cm(-2) after 1,000 cycles and the potential displays a slight change after holding the current density at - 20 mA cm(-2) for 10 h. This improved performance is supposed to be originated from the combination between the worm-like RhNi alloy, doped S atoms, and the three-dimensional structure. Overall, the results obtained and the facile synthesis methods offer a promising electrocatalyst for scaling-up hydrogen evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据