4.8 Article

Highly selective oxidation of glycerol over Bi/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55 heterostructure: Dual reaction pathways induced by photogenerated 1O2 and holes

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 206-214

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.047

关键词

Bi/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55; Glycerol; Selective oxidation; O-1(2); Photogenerated hole

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671153, 21471121]
  2. Department of Education of Hubei Province under the Project of Science and Technology Innovation Team of Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientists [T201606]
  3. Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry (Jilin University) [2017-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective oxidation of glycerol to produce aimed high-value added products is of great importance in chemical industry. Photocatalytic oxidation provides a promising and green strategy for selective glycerol oxidation. In this work, we develop a Bi/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55 heterostructure via a facile solvothermal method for the selective oxidation glycerol to 1, 3-dihydroxyacetone (DHA) in water under visible light irradiation. The excellent performance in activity and selectivity of Bi/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55 heterostructure for DHA production is attributed to a dual-pathway photocatalytic reaction process. The mass production O-1(2) ascribed to the reduced energy gap (Delta E-ST), the enhanced spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and the presence of oxygen vacancy is beneficial for the selective oxidation of glycerol to DHA. Simultaneously, the metallic bismuth in the heterostructure promotes the separation of photogenerated holes with efficient redox potential and facilitates the binding bismuth with ortho-hydroxyl in glycerol, thus enhancing the yield and selectivity of DHA production. This work provides a novel strategy and thorough understanding of the development of highly efficient bismuth-based photocatalyst for selective oxidation in organic reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据