4.8 Article

Cation deficiency enabled fast oxygen reduction reaction for a novel SOFC cathode with promoted CO2 tolerance

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 546-555

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.075

关键词

Solid oxide fuel cells; Oxygen reduction reaction; Cation deficiency; CO2 tolerance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872143, 51790492, 51472118]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30916011104]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro & nano Materials and Technology in Jiangsu Province [30917014106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cation deficiency in perovskite oxides can alter the crystal structure, oxygen stoichiometry and other physi-ochemical properties, substantially promote the electro-catalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at elevated temperatures. In this work, a small strontium deficiency was introduced into SrCo0.8Nb0.1Ta0.1O3-delta (S100CNT) to promote the electrochemical activity of ORR. Cation deficient Sr0.95Co0.8Nb0.1Ta0.1O3-delta (S095CNT) displayed higher oxygen vacancy concentration than that of stoichiometric S100CNT. The decreased average bonding energy (ABE) and the increased critical radius (r(c)) of S095CNT could be responsible for the decreased activation energy for oxygen ions transfer. Consequently, the ORR activity of S095CNT cathode was significantly improved. The S095CNT cathode shows an area specific resistance of 0.07 Omega cm(2) at 650 degrees C, which was only about 63% of S100CNT. Moreover, S095CNT displayed much higher CO2 tolerance than the state-ofthe-art Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta (BSCF) cathode for SOFC. Thus, the fast ORR and high stability makes S095CNT promising material for devices involving oxygen electrochemistry such as solid oxide fuel cells, electrolysis cells, or gas separation membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据