4.6 Article

The regional green growth and sustainable development of China in the presence of sustainable resources recovered from pollutions

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 290, 期 1-2, 页码 27-45

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03226-x

关键词

Green growth; Environmental efficiency; Non-discretionary input; Technology innovation; Slack based measure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid economic development of China has intensified the country's many problems. Among them, energy shortage and environmental pollution are two main problems, which highly affects the economic growth and sustainable development. To achieve more rapid green growth, the innovative technology by reusing the environmental wastes has been widely used since doing so not only decreases the environment pollution, but also further brings more natural resource. The present paper establishes a two-stage structure for evaluating the regional green growth and sustainable development in China by calculating the efficiency of energy saving and pollution treatment separately. Specifically, a set of models based on slack-based measure approach are constructed in which non-discretionary inputs can be calculated in both resource utilization stage and pollution treatment stage. Comparing with the traditional models, the new proposed models can measure the performance of resources saving and pollution treatment with considering the influence of non-discretionary inputs. An empirical application on Chinese 30 regions during 2011-2015 have been done to illustrate the use of our framework and the performance of regional green growth and sustainable development. Based on the efficiency results, we find that the efficiency scores of the provinces in central and northeast area are lower, which is mostly caused by their poor performance on pollution treatment. Both the environmental efficiency scores and target values for performance improvement are obtained in this paper to enlighten the corresponding decision-makers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据