4.2 Article

Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET-CT for large vessel involvement assessment in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis and negative temporal artery biopsy

期刊

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 7, 页码 512-520

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01358-5

关键词

F-18-FDG PET-CT; Giant cell arteritis; Temporal artery biopsy; Large vessel vasculitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of F-18-FDG PET-CT for large vessel involvement in patients with suspected giant cells arteritis (GCA) and a negative temporal artery biopsy (TAB).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB who underwent an F-18-FDG PET-CT. Ten vascular segments were studied using a visual score and a semi-quantitative method based on SUVmax ratio with respect to liver uptake. The diagnosis of GCA was established during a mean follow-up of 42months, based on the presence of clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and imaging data compatible with GCA, good response to corticosteroid therapy, and no differential diagnosis after a follow-up of at least 18months.ResultsWe included 63 patients (30 men and 33 women, aged 6712years). F-18-FDG PET-CT showed large vessel involvement in 22 patients, 14 of whom were finally diagnosed with GCA. Forty-one patients were F-18-FDG PET-CT negative, 9 of whom were finally diagnosed with GCA. Overall, F-18-FDG uptake by large vessel yielded 61% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 64% positive predictive value, 78% negative predictive value, and 73% diagnostic accuracy. A significant number of patients were treated by corticosteroids before F-18-FDG PET-CT. However, corticosteroid therapy did not impact significantly the diagnostic performance, although there was a trend to a lower sensitivity in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy for more than 3days.Conclusions F-18-FDG PET-CT is a useful imaging technique to assess large vessel involvement in patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据