4.8 Article

Reaction Monitoring Using SABRE-Hyperpolarized Benchtop (1 T) NMR Spectroscopy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 10, 页码 6695-6701

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00729

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/M020983/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [092506, 098335]
  3. Pfizer
  4. Department of Chemistry Wild Fund Scholarship
  5. University of York
  6. EPSRC [EP/M020983/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of [IrCl(COD)(IMes)] (COD = cis,cis-1,5-cyclooctadiene, IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl)imidazole-2-ylidene) in the presence of an excess of para-hydrogen (p-H-2) and a substrate (4-aminopyridine (4-AP) or 4-methylpyridine (4-MP)) into [Ir(H)(2)(IMes)(substrate)(3)]Cl is monitored by H-1 NMR spectroscopy using a benchtop (1 T) spectrometer in conjunction with the p-H-2-based hyperpolarization technique signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE). A series of single-shot H-1 NMR measurements are used to monitor the chemical changes that take place in solution through the lifetime of the hyperpolarized response. Non-hyperpolarized high-field H-1 NMR control measurements were also undertaken to confirm that the observed time-dependent changes relate directly to the underlying chemical evolution. The formation of [Ir(H)(2)(IMes)(substrate)(3)]Cl is further linked to the hydrogen isotope exchange (HIE) reaction, which leads to the incorporation of deuterium into the ortho positions of 4-AP, where the source of deuterium is the solvent, methanol-d(4). Comparable reaction monitoring results are achieved at both high-field (9.4 T) and low-field (1 T). It is notable that the low sensitivity of the benchtop (1 T) NMR enables the use of protio solvents, which when used here allows the effects of catalyst formation and substrate deuteration to be separated. Collectively, these methods illustrate how low-cost low-field NMR measurements provide unique insight into a complex catalytic process through a combination of hyperpolarization and relaxation data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据