4.7 Article

Airway Bacterial Load and Inhaled Antibiotic Response in Bronchiectasis

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1651OC

关键词

quality of life; QoL-B; airway inflammation; inhaled aztreonam

资金

  1. Gilead Sciences Inc.
  2. European Respiratory Society through the EMBARC2 consortium
  3. short-term research fellowship [STRTF201710-00217]
  4. PERIS 2017
  5. GSK/British Lung Foundation Chair of Respiratory Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: The principal underlying inhaled antibiotic treatment in bronchiectasis is that airway bacterial load drives inflammation, and therefore antibiotic treatment will reduce symptoms. Objectives: To determine the relationship between bacterial load and clinical outcomes, assess the stability of bacterial load over time, and test the hypothesis that response to inhaled antibiotics would be predicted by baseline bacterial load. Methods: We performed three studies. Studies 1 and 2 were prospective studies including adults with bronchiectasis. Study 3 was a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial of inhaled aztreonam. A priori patients were divided into low (<10(5) cfu/g), moderate (10(5)-10(6) cfu/g), and high bacterial load (>= 10(7) cfu/g) using quantitative sputum culture. Measurements and Main Results: Bacterial load was a stable trait associated with worse quality of life and more airway inflammation in studies 1, 2, and 3. In study 3, patients with high bacterial load showed an improvement in the primary endpoint (Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis-Respiratory Symptoms Score at Week 4) in favor of aztreonam (mean difference of 9.7 points; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-16.0; P = 0.003). The proportion of patients who achieved an increase above the minimum clinically important difference was higher in the aztreonam group at Week 4 (63% vs. 37%; P = 0.01) and at Week 12 (62% vs. 38%; P = 0.01) only in high bacterial load patients. Conclusions: Improvement of quality of life with inhaled aztreonam was only evident in patients with high bacterial load. Bacterial load may be a useful biomarker of severity of disease and treatment response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据