4.6 Article

Google Trends and pollen concentrations in allergy and airway diseases in France

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 74, 期 10, 页码 1910-1919

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.13804

关键词

allergy; asthma; google trends; pollen; rhinitis

资金

  1. European Union Development and Structural Funds, Fondation FMC VIA-LR, RNSA Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Google Trends (GTs) is a web-based surveillance tool that explores the searching trends of specific queries via Google. This tool proposes to reflect the real-life epidemiology of allergic rhinitis and asthma. However, the validation of GTs against pollen concentrations is missing at the country level. Objectives In the present study, we used GTs (a) to compare the terms related to allergy in France, (b) to assess seasonal variations across the country for 5 years and (c) to compare GTs and pollen concentrations for 2016. Methods Google Trends queries were initially searched to investigate the terms reflecting pollen and allergic diseases. 13- and 5-year GTs were used in France. Then, 5-year GTs were assessed in all metropolitan French regions to assess the seasonality of GTs. Finally, GTs were compared with pollen concentrations (Reseau National de Surveillance en Aerobiology) for 2016 in seven regions (GTs) and corresponding cities (pollen concentrations). Results The combination of searches for allergy as a disease, pollen as a disease cause and ragweed as a plant was needed to fully assess the pollen season in France. Asthma did not show any seasonality. Using the 5-year GTs, an annual and clear seasonality of queries was found in all regions depending on the predicted pollen exposure for spring and a summer peak but not for winter peaks. The agreement between GT queries and pollen concentrations is usually poor except for spring trees and grasses. Moreover, cypress pollens are insufficiently reported by GTs. Conclusions Google Trends cannot predict the pollen season in France.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据