期刊
ALGORITHMICA
卷 81, 期 9, 页码 3422-3463出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-019-00584-7
关键词
House allocation problem; Assignment problem; Pareto optimal matching; Randomised mechanisms; Truthfulness
资金
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K01000X/1, EP/K010042/1, EP/P028306/1]
- [EC 2014]
- EPSRC [EP/P028306/1, EP/P029825/1, EP/K010042/1, EP/K01000X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
We study the House Allocation problem (also known as the Assignment problem), i. e., the problem of allocating a set of objects among a set of agents, where each agent has ordinal preferences (possibly involving ties) over a subset of the objects. We focus on truthful mechanisms without monetary transfers for finding large Pareto optimal matchings. It is straightforward to show that no deterministic truthful mechanism can approximate a maximum cardinality Pareto optimal matching with ratio better than 2. We thus consider randomised mechanisms. We give a natural and explicit extension of the classical Random Serial Dictatorship Mechanism (RSDM) specifically for the House Allocation problem where preference lists can include ties. We thus obtain a universally truthful randomised mechanism for finding a Pareto optimal matching and show that it achieves an approximation ratio of e e-1. The same bound holds even when agents have priorities (weights) and our goal is to find a maximum weight (as opposed to maximum cardinality) Pareto optimal matching. On the other hand we give a lower bound of 18 13 on the approximation ratio of any universally truthful Pareto optimal mechanism in settings with strict preferences. By using a characterisation result of Bade, we show that any randomised mechanism that is a symmetrisation of a truthful, non-bossy and Pareto optimal mechanism has an improved lower bound of e e-1. Since our new mechanism is a symmetrisation of RSDM for strict preferences, it follows that this lower bound is tight. We moreover interpret our problem in terms of the classical secretary problem and prove that our mechanism provides the best randomised strategy of the administrator who interviews the applicants.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据