4.7 Article

Numerical investigation on the forced oscillation of shock train in hypersonic inlet with translating cowl

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 311-322

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.022

关键词

Forced oscillation; Variable background waves; Sinusoidal backpressure perturbation; Frequency; Amplitude

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51722601]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.BRETIV.201802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the forced oscillations of shock train caused by sinusoidal backpressure perturbations with different amplitudes and frequencies in a hypersonic inlet equipped with translating cowl, numerical simulations have been conducted with the application of dynamic mesh method. The results reveal that under sinusoidal backpressure perturbations, the shock train oscillates and propagates upstream as the cowl moves downstream rather than crosses the shock-impact points abruptly with significant migration distance, compared to the result obtained under constant backpressure. Meanwhile, the amplitude of forced oscillation increases when the shock train leading edge oscillates around the adjacent shock-impact points. The larger amplitude of backpressure perturbation not only aggravates the forced oscillations but also increases the number of shock-impact points that the shock train crosses in one cycle, which leads to complicated changes in the shock train structures, even involving the separation mode transition. The frequency of forced oscillation equals to the one of backpressure perturbation invariably, but with certain phase lags due to the interference of background waves. Although the variable background waves do have the ability to affect the amplitude of forced oscillation, they are incapable of changing the frequency of forced oscillation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据