4.8 Article

High-Performance Flexible Thermoelectric Devices Based on All-Inorganic Hybrid Films for Harvesting Low-Grade Heat

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201900304

关键词

3D structure; all-inorganic films; flexible thermoelectric; photovoltaic-thermoelectric device; wearable

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51603037]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232019A3-02]
  3. DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program [LZB2019002]
  4. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [16XD1400100]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipally [16JC1400700]
  6. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2017-01-07-00-03-E00055]
  7. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [16ZR1401500]
  8. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1400400]
  9. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2017QNRC001]
  10. International Joint Laboratory for Advanced Fiber and Low-dimension Materials [18520750400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fabrication of a flexible thermoelectric (TE) device that contains flexible, all-inorganic hybrid thin films (p-type single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs)/Sb2Te3 and n-type reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/Bi2Te3) is reported. The optimized power factors of the p-type and n-type hybrid thin films at ambient temperature are about 55 and 108 mu W m(-1) K-2, respectively. The high performance of these films that are fabricated through the combination of vacuum filtration and annealing can be attributed to their planar orientation and network structure. In addition, a TE device, with 10 couples of legs, shows an output power of 23.6 mu W at a temperature gradient of 70 K. A prototype of an integrated photovoltaic-TE (PV-TE) device demonstrates the ability to harvest low-grade waste thermal energy from the human body and solar irradiation. The flexible TE and PV-TE device have great potential in wearable energy harvesting and management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据