4.8 Review

Review of Polymer-Based Nanodielectric Exploration and Film Scale-Up for Advanced Capacitors

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201808567

关键词

capacitor; composite; dielectric constant; nanoparticles; polymer; scale-up; thin films

资金

  1. Start-up fund of Guangdong Technion Israel Institute of Technology
  2. US DARPA [FA9451-08-C-0166]
  3. US Department of Energy [DEEE0006433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The uprising demands for electrical power and electrification requires advanced dielectric functionalities including high capacitance density, high energy density, high current handling capability, high voltage, high temperature, high thermal conductivity, light weight, and environmental reliability. Nanodielectric engineering emerges and attracts extensive efforts from many countries as a result. Unlike prior reviews focusing on lab scale nanocomposite study, this review focuses on recent innovations in polymer-based nanodielectric design on a large scale and their film scale-up efforts for advanced capacitors. The unconventional polymer-nanofiller engineering and their process in the last two decades are discussed. The nanofunctionalized polymers on a molecular level for high dielectric constants and high dielectric strength are briefly described. The challenge associated with film scale-up and retention of nanodielectric properties are then pointed out to be crucial toward a transfer of dielectric and capacitor technology. Several important attempts at scaling up dielectric films and capacitors recently supported by the US government and industry are reviewed. An alternative strategic approach to achieving high performance polymer films is introduced by leveraging 2D surface coating on commercially mature large-scale polymer films. Future pathways for high quality scalable dielectric films exhibiting desirable dielectric properties and feasibility for capacitor manufacturing are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据