4.4 Article

Evaluating diurnal changes in choroidal sublayer perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 97, 期 8, 页码 E1062-E1068

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14140

关键词

choriocapillaris; choroidal perfusion; diurnal variation; Haller's layer; optical coherence tomography angiography; Sattler's layer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To investigate diurnal changes of choroidal sublayer perfusion in normal eyes and to identify influencing factors using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods A prospective study was conducted on healthy volunteers, each of whom underwent repeated measurements of subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) via enhanced depth imaging (EDI) optical coherence tomography (OCT) as well as perfusion of choroidal vascular sublayers using OCTA at 7 a.m., 12 p.m., 4 p.m. and 8 p.m. Possible interactions between diurnal variations and other factors, such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), gender and age, were evaluated. Results A total of 22 eyes from 22 participants were analysed. Mean age of participants was 56 years. A significant pattern of diurnal variation was observed for SFCT (p < 0.001) as well as perfusion of Sattler's layer (SLP; p = 0.009) and Haller's layer (HLP; p = 0.003). SFCT demonstrated a linear decrease, being thicker in the morning (348 mu m) and thinner in the evening (310 mu m). Both, SLP and HLP showed a quadratic relation to time of day, increasing from morning (64% and 76%) to afternoon (66% and 77%), before decreasing again in the evening (64% and 76%). HLP changes were significantly associated with fluctuations of MAP (B = 0.0007; CI 0.0001-0.0014; p = 0.047). No significant differences with regard to gender were detectable. However, older participants (>= 60 years) had fewer diurnal changes (p = 0.042). Conclusion Optical coherence tomography angiography-based analysis of choroidal sublayer perfusion demonstrated significant diurnal variations. Therefore, it is important to account for time of day, when comparing longitudinal OCTA data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据