4.3 Article

Exploratory analysis of oral glibenclamide in acute ischemic stroke

期刊

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 140, 期 3, 页码 212-218

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ane.13134

关键词

acute ischemic stroke; brain edema; glibenclamide; prognosis; sulfonylurea receptor 1

资金

  1. Initiative Project of Clinical Research of Southern Medical University [LC2016ZD001]
  2. Outstanding Youths Development Scheme of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University [2016J005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Intravenous glibenclamide (GBC) exerts neuroprotection in both preclinical and preliminary clinical studies. This study explored the safety and potential efficacy of oral GBC in patients with acute hemispheric infarction. Materials & Methods During January 2017 and August 2017, adult volunteers were recruited to receive oral GBC treatment, if they presented with an acute anterior ischemic stroke and a National Institute of Health Stroke Score of >= 8. Controls were those who met the above inclusion criteria and had not been on GBC or other sulfonylureas prior to stroke or after hospitalization. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. Results We included 213 patients in the unmatched cohort (20 in the GBC group and 193 in the control group) and 40 patients (20 in each group) in the matched cohort. In both cohorts, GBC treatment did not increase the risks of early death, hypoglycemia, and early neurological deterioration. Although GBC did not substantially improve 6-month functional outcome that measured in shift analysis of mRS, a slight trend toward less severe disability and death (mRS 5-6) was observed. In the matched cohort, GBC treatment was associated with lighter brain edema, when CED score was used for evaluation. Conclusions In this study, oral GBC is safe in treating acute hemispheric infarction and might have potential in preventing brain edema and consequential severe disability and death. An adequately powered and randomized trial is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据