4.5 Article

Serum levels of immunoglobulin G and complement 3 differentiate non-diabetic renal disease from diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

ACTA DIABETOLOGICA
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 873-881

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-019-01339-0

关键词

Non-diabetic renal disease; Diabetic nephropathy; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Immunoglobulin G; Complement 3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670662]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsHeavy proteinuria caused by non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to investigate specific predictors for NDRD in addition to traditional indicators in T2DM.MethodsA total of 341 patients with T2DM who underwent renal biopsy were retrospectively included. Eligible patients were divided into a nephrotic-range group (n=194) and a non-nephrotic-range group (n=147) based on proteinuria level. Risk factors for NDRD were evaluated using logistic regression, and the diagnostic implications of these variables were assessed by subgroup.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression indicated that serum IgG level (OR, 0.762; 95% CI, 0.628-0.924; p=0.006) was an independent predictor of NDRD in the nephrotic-range group. However, in the non-nephrotic-range group, increased C3 level was an independent risk factor for NDRD (OR, 1.313; 95% CI, 1.028-1.678; p=0.029). In the nephrotic-range group, the optimal cutoff value of IgG for predicting NDRD was 734.0mg/dl, with 67.8% sensitivity and 74.8% specificity, and IgG734.0mg/dl was the best predictor of NDRD. In the non-nephrotic-range group, the optimal cutoff value of C3 for predicting NDRD was 122.0mg/dl with low sensitivity (30.9%) but high specificity (97.8%).ConclusionsAt different levels of proteinuria, reduced IgG and increased C3 levels were independent indicators of NDRD in T2DM. Insights into these factors will help to advance the clinical management of NDRD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据