4.6 Article

Impact of Gold Nanoparticles on Amyloid β-Induced Alzheimer's Disease in a Rat Animal Model: Involvement of STIM Proteins

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 2299-2309

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00622

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; learning; memory; rat animal model; gold nanoparticles

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences [94-04-33-31230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of neurodegenerative amyloid disorder causing progressive cognitive decline and memory loss. A considerable number of therapies for AD rely on inhibition/delay/ dissociation of amyloid beta (A beta) oligomers and fibrils. In this case, nanoparticles (NPs) demonstrated substantial effects on the A beta fibrillation process; however, their effects on progressive cognitive decline and memory have been poorly investigated in vivo. In this study, acquisition and retention of spatial learning and memory are studied in a rat animal model of AD after intrahippocampal (IH) and intraperitoneal (IP) injections of a model NP, i.e., gold NPs (AuNPs). The outcomes revealed that the AuNPs could improve the acquisition and retention of spatial learning and memory in A beta treated rats as indicated by decreased time (A beta: 39.60 +/- 3.23 s vs A beta+AuNPs: 25.78 +/- 2.80 s) and distance (A beta: 917.98 +/- 50.81 cm vs A beta+AuNPs: 589.09 +/- 65.96 cm) of finding the hidden platform during training days and by increased time spent in the target quadrant (A beta: 19.40 +/- 0.98 s vs Afi+AuNPs: 29.36 +/- 1.14 s) in the probe test in Morris water maze (MWM). Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF, cAMP response element binding protein, CREB, and stromal interaction molecules, e.g., STIM1 and STIM2 was also increased, supporting improved neural survival. Our outcomes may pave a way for mechanistic insights toward the role of NPs on retrieval of the deteriorated behavioral functions in brain tissue after AD outbreak.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据