4.8 Article

Unique Ni Crystalline Core/Ni Phosphide Amorphous Shell Heterostructured Electrocatalyst for Hydrazine Oxidation Reaction of Fuel Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 19048-19055

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b00878

关键词

hydrazine oxidation reaction; Ni@NiP/C core-shell heterostructured electrocatalysts; Ni phosphide; amorphous structure; direct hydrazine fuel cells

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Beijing [Z171100000917011]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872003, 21722601]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Australian Research Council under Discovery Project scheme [DP150102044, DP180100731, DP180100568]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is highly attractive but challenging to develop transition-metal electrocatalysts for direct hydrazine fuel cells (DHzFCs). In this work, a nickel crystalline core@nickel phosphide amorphous shell heterostructured electrocatalyst supported by active carbon (Ni@NiP/C) is developed. Ni@NiP/C with a P/Ni molar ratio of 3:100, Ni@NiP3.0/C, exhibits outstanding catalytic activity for the hydrazine oxidation reaction (HzOR) in alkaline solution, achieving a much better catalytic activity (2675.1 A g(Ni)(-1)@0.25 V vs RHE) and high stability, as compared to Ni nanoparticles supported on carbon (Ni/C) and Pt/C catalysts. The results indicate that formation of the NiP amorphous shell effectively inhibits the passivation of the Ni core active sites and enhances the adsorption of hydrazine on Ni by improving the adsorption energy, leading to high electrochemical activity and stability of the Ni@ NiP3.0/C catalysts for HzOR. The density functional theory calculation confirms the structural and electrocatalytic effect of the core shell heterostructure on the stability and activity of Ni active sites for HzOR. The unique crystalline core/amorphous shell-structured Ni@NiP/C demonstrates promising potential as an effective electrocatalyst for DHzFCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据