4.8 Article

Infrared Photodetector Based on the Photothermionic Effect of Graphene-Nanowall/Silicon Heterojunction

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 17663-17669

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b03329

关键词

graphene; nanoparticle; photodetector; hot electron; Schottky barrier; thermionic emission

资金

  1. NSFC [61705229]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2015316, 2018416]
  3. Project of Chongqing brain science Collaborative Innovation Center
  4. Project of CAS Western Young Scholar
  5. Project of CQ CSTC [cstc2017zdcy-zdyfX0001, cstc2017zdcy-zdyfX0078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of the slow relaxation process according to weak acoustic phonon interaction, the photothermionic effect in graphene could be much more obvious than in the metal film, so a graphene heterojunction photodetector based on the photothermionic effect is promising for infrared imaging applications. However, the 2.3% absorption rate of the graphene film presents a severe limitation. Here, in situ grown graphene nanowalls (GNWs) were integrated on the silicon substrate interfaced with Au nanoparticles. Because of the strong infrared absorption and hot-carrier relaxation process in GNWs, the as prepared GNWs/Au/silicon heterojunction has a photo to dark ratio of 2 X 10(4), responsivity of 138 mA/W, and linear dynamic range of 89.7 dB, with a specific detectivity of 1.4 X 10(10) and 1.6 x 10(9) cm Hz(1/2)/W based on calculated and measured noise, respectively, in 1550 nm at room temperature, and has the best performance among silicon-compatible infrared photodetectors without any complicated waveguide structures. Obvious photoresponses are also detected in the mid-infrared and terahertz band. The interface Au particle is found to reduce the barrier height and enhance absorption. The device structure in this report could be compatible with the semiconductor process, so that infrared photodetectors with high integration density and low cost could be potentially realized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据