4.3 Article

Multiscale influence of trace Tb addition on the magnetostriction and ductility of ⟨100⟩ oriented directionally solidified Fe-Ga crystals

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.033401

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China (NSFC) [51331001, 51671011, 51674011]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610738, 2018T110026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New-generation magnetostrictive applications in micromanipulation instruments, torque sensing, and transducers require materials that offer a combination of large magnetostriction and good structural properties. Fe100-xGax-based (x = 17-19) alloys are potential candidates. In this work, the solidification behavior of Tb-doped FeGa alloys is investigated by theoretical simulation and experimental observation; directional solidification parameters are optimized to obtain the largest solid solubility of Tb while keeping the (100) preferred orientation. The multiscale evolution of the structure with Tb additions that enhances both magnetostriction and tensile properties is systematically studied in alloys prepared under optimal directional solidification conditions. Magnetostriction of 387 ppm is accompanied by a remarkable tensile fracture strain of 12.5% in 0.05 at.% Tb-doped Fe81Ga19. The values represent an improvement of similar to 29% in magnetostriction and a sixfold enhancement in tensile fracture strain compared with undoped binary Fe81Ga19 . The increase in magnetostriction is attributed to the higher density of tetragonally modified D0(3) nanoinclusions induced by traces of Tb. The enhancement in ductility is explained by the dislocation concentration around the submicron-scale Tb-rich precipitates which can effectively hinder their motion. The FeGa alloys doped with traces of Tb can be easily processed to thin sheets or wires and are likely to be extensively applied because they contain only traces of rare earths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据