4.1 Article

Longitudinal associations of kinematics and fear-avoidance beliefs with disability, work ability and pain intensity in persons with low back pain

期刊

MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 49-54

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Fund for Post-Graduate Training in Physiotherapy
  2. Liaison Committee

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Impaired lumbar movement has cross-sectionally been associated with low back pain (LBP); however, the consequence of impaired movement on disability and pain in persons with LBP is poorly understood. Furthermore, fear-avoidance beliefs (FAB) may influence spinal movement, but the relation between fear-avoidance and kinematics is unclear. Objectives: To investigate the longitudinal associations of kinematics and FAB with disability, work ability and pain in patients with LBP. Further, to explore associations between FAB and kinematics. Design: Prospective observational study. Method: Kinematic measures were performed on 44 persons with LBP at baseline, three and nine months. Motion sensors identified range-of-motion and velocity during a spinal flexion/extension. FAB, disability, work ability and pain were reported at all time points using questionnaires. Results: Increased range-of-motion was weakly associated with less disability (-0.14 points, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.06). Velocity was not associated with disability, work ability or pain. Higher FAB of physical activity were associated with more disability (1.50 points, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.49) and pain (0.37 points, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.62). Higher work-related FAB was associated with lower work ability (- 0.37 points, 95% CI -0.68 to - 0.05). Moreover, higher FAB showed weak associations with lower velocity in the initial movement phase (- 3.3 degrees/s, 95% CI -6.1 to - 0.5). Conclusions: Of the kinematic measures, only range-of-motion was related to disability. Higher FAB was weakly associated with all self-reported outcomes and with lower velocity only at the initial flexion phase. However, the magnitude of these associations suggest marginal clinical importance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据