4.0 Article

Light Exposure during Days with Night, Outdoor, and Indoor Work

期刊

ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 651-665

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy110

关键词

chronobiology; exposure; leisure; light at night; occupational exposure; outdoor work; shift work; sunlight

资金

  1. Danish Working Environment Research Fund [02-2010-09]
  2. NordForsk, The Nordic Programme on Health and Welfare [74809]
  3. Aarhus University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess light exposure during days with indoor, outdoor, and night work and days off work. Methods: Light intensity was continuously recorded for 7 days across the year among indoor (n = 170), outdoor (n = 151), and night workers (n = 188) in Denmark (55-56 degrees N) equipped with a personal light recorder. White light intensity, duration above 80, 1000, and 2500 lux, and proportion of red, green, and blue light was depicted by time of the day and season for work days and days off work. Results: Indoor workers' average light exposure only intermittently exceeded 1000 lux during daytime working hours in summer and never in winter. During daytime working hours, most outdoor workers exceeded 2500 lux in summer and 1000 lux in winter. Night workers spent on average 10-50 min >80 lux when working night shifts. During days off work, indoor and night workers were exposed to higher light intensities than during work days and few differences were seen between indoor, outdoor, and night workers. The spectral composition of light was similar for indoor, outdoor, and night workers during days at and off work. Conclusion: The night workers of this study were during night hours on average exposed for a limited time to light intensities expected to suppress melatonin. The indoor workers were exposed to light levels during daylight hours that may reduce general well-being and mood, especially in winter. Outdoor workers were during summer daylight hours exposed to light levels comparable to those used for the treatment of depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据