4.6 Article

NMDA Receptor Signaling Mediates cFos Expression via Top2β-Induced DSBs in Glioblastoma Cells

期刊

CANCERS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030306

关键词

GBM; ionotropic glutamate receptor; topoisomerase II beta; stimulus induced DSB; early response gene; NMDAR subunit GluN2B; radiotherapy; LN229; U-87MG; ifenprodil

类别

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF
  2. NeuroRad) [02NUK034B]
  3. German Research Society (DFG) [GRK1657]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activation of Ca2+-permeable N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor channels (NMDARs) is crucial for the development and survival of neurons, but many cancers use NMDAR-mediated signaling as well, enhancing the growth and invasiveness of tumors. Thus, NMDAR-dependent pathways emerge as a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we use the LN229 and U-87MG glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells and immunofluorescence staining of 53BP1 to analyze NMDAR-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which represent an important step in the NMDAR signaling pathway in neurons by facilitating the expression of early response genes. Our results show that NMDAR activation leads to the induction of DSBs in a subpopulation of glioma cells. In a further analogy to neurons, our results demonstrate that the induction of DSBs in LN229 cells is dependent on the activity of topoisomerase II beta (Top2 beta). Western blot analysis revealed that the inhibition of NMDARs, cAMP-responsive element binding transcription factor (CREB) and Top beta decreased the expression of the proto-oncogene cFos. Knockdown of Top2 beta with siRNAs resulted in a downregulation of cFos and increased the radiosensitivity of LN229 cells in clonogenic survival. We also observed impaired cFos expression upon NMDAR and Top2 beta inhibition in a primary GBM cell line, suggesting that NMDAR signaling may be widely used by GBMs, demonstrating the potential of targeting NMDAR signaling proteins for GBM therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据