4.8 Article

Direct visualization of coexisting channels of interaction in CeSb

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat7158

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1607753, DMR-1611392]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's EPiQS Initiative [GBMF4374]
  3. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05-CH11231]
  4. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1106400]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2015R1A2A1A15051540]
  6. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1411]
  7. ARO [W911NF-14-1-0525]
  8. QuantEmX grant from ICAM [GBMF5305]
  9. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF5305]
  10. Division Of Materials Research
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1607753] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A15051540] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our understanding of correlated electron systems is vexed by the complexity of their interactions. Heavy fermion compounds are archetypal examples of this physics, leading to exotic properties that weave magnetism, superconductivity and strange metal behavior together. The Kondo semimetal CeSb is an unusual example where different channels of interaction not only coexist, but have coincident physical signatures, leading to decades of debate about the microscopic picture describing the interactions between the f moments and the itinerant electron sea. Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, we resonantly enhance the response of the Ce f electrons across the magnetic transitions of CeSb and find there are two distinct modes of interaction that are simultaneously active, but on different kinds of carriers. This study reveals how correlated systems can reconcile the coexistence of different modes on interaction-by separating their action in momentum space, they allow their coexistence in real space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据