4.6 Article

A Parts Per Billion (ppb) Sensor for NO2 with Microwatt (μW) Power Requirements Based on Micro Light Plates

期刊

ACS SENSORS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 822-826

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00150

关键词

gas sensor; nitrogen dioxide (NO2); high sensitivity; photo/light activation; micro light plate (mu LP); light emitting diode (LED); InGaN; ultra low power

资金

  1. European Research Council [336917]
  2. Lower Saxony Ministry for Science and Culture (N-MWK)
  3. EU Marie Curie Action COFUND [TECSPR15-1-0001]
  4. Serra Hunter Program
  5. DFG Project GrK NanoMet
  6. MINECO
  7. TecnioSpring fellowship programme of ACCIO, Government of Catalonia
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [336917] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A film of gas sensitive ZnO nanoparticles has been coupled with a low-power micro light plate (mu LP) to achieve a NO2-parts-per-billion conductometric gas sensor operating at room temperature. In this mu LP configuration, an InGaN-based LED (emitting at 455 nm) is integrated at a few hundred nanometers distance from the sensor material, leading to sensor photoactivation with well controlled, uniform, and high irradiance conditions, and very low electrical power needs. The response curves to different NO2 concentrations as a function of the irradiance displayed a bell-like shape. Responses of 20% to 25 ppb of NO2 were already observed at irradiances of 5 mWatts.cm(-2) (applying an electrical power as low as 30 mu W). In the optimum illumination conditions (around 60 mWatts.cm(-2), or 200 mu W of electric power), responses of 94% to 25 ppb were achieved, corresponding to a lower detection limit of 1 ppb of NO2. Higher irradiance values worsened the sensor response in the parts per-billion range of NO2 concentrations. The responses to other gases such as NH3, CO, and CH4 were much smaller, showing a certain selectivity toward NO2. The effects of humidity on the sensor response are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据