4.2 Article

Communicating Museum Collections Information Online: Analysis of the Philosophy of Communication Extending the Constructivist Approach

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3283253

关键词

Museum online catalogues; museum digital collections; communication strategy; communication philosophy; constructivism

资金

  1. European Commission [MEST-CT-2004-514539]
  2. Greek General Directorate of Research and Technology
  3. European Commission's H2020 MSCA ITN 2017 Programme [MSCA-ITN-ETN-2018-764859]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultural heritage institutions are spending considerable effort and resources to provide online access to their collection catalogues and collection management systems, usually through their institutional websites. This improves accessibility and supports research and engagement by diverse user groups, as well as meeting the increasing expectation by audiences that this type of information will be freely and easily available online. However, cultural organisations have not responded to these needs in the same way and have been employing different web tools and features to present their collections online. In this article, we argue that the technological implementation choices and the type of content provided reflect also the philosophy of communication of the institution itself. We used the constructivist approach's learning theory and theory of knowledge and combined these interrelated epistemological and cognitive perspectives to analyse the communication philosophy of a large number of museum online catalogues. The article presents the research carried out initially in 2007 through 2009 and then again in 2017, studying the provision of collections information online by different types of museums across Europe and in the United States. This enabled us to establish categories of presentation types and study the changes over time. The results highlighted the major shift towards participatory practices which have been transforming the cultural heritage world over the past years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据