4.2 Article

Effects of endophytic and ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes on Quercus virginiana seedling growth and nutrient absorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 457-470

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2019.1570467

关键词

Atractiellales; Cantharellales; phytohormone; root symbiosis; Sebacinales

类别

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research of Chinese Academy of Forestry [CAFYBB2017MA003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31722014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quercus virginiana (Fagaceae), native to the southeastern United States, has recently been introduced to the Yangtze Delta (China) and is often planted in landscaping and in coastal shelter forests. Here, we performed pot inoculation assays to evaluate the effects of two types of basidiomycetous root fungal symbionts, across four orders, on the growth and nutrient absorption of Q.virginiana seedlings. The results indicated that two isolates showed plant growth-promoting activities 2months after inoculation. In particular, the ectomycorrhizal Sistotrema sp. (Cantharellales) had a pronounced effect on root development and morphology. With regard to nutrient absorption, the total nitrogen content in aboveground tissues was improved in inoculated seedlings, although most differences were not significant. Meanwhile, the total phosphorus contents in seedlings were either positively or negatively affected, probably depending on the symbiont type. Interestingly, the total potassium content in stems and leaves was significantly enhanced in all treatment groups. In addition, indole-3-acetic acid and abscisic acid production were determined in Sistotrema sp. and Atractiella rhizophila (Pucciniomycotina) by high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Our findings suggest that both endophytic and ectomycorrhizal fungi have beneficial effects on Q.virginiana growth, and highlight the potential for the development of mycobiome-based seedling raising techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据