4.4 Article

Dietary administration of probiotics to sows and/or their neonates improves the reproductive performance, incidence of post-weaning diarrhea and histopathological parameters in the intestine of weaned piglets

期刊

ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL
卷 87, 期 12, 页码 1501-1510

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/asj.12565

关键词

diarrhea incidence; probiotics; reproductive performance; sow; weaning piglets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Probiotics have gained considerable attention with respect to their beneficial effects on livestock performance and health. The most significant effects of probiotics on the gut microbiota and the host animals take place when they are included in diets during particularly stressful periods such as weaning and/or at the beginning of the lactation period. The probiotics Bacillus mesentericus strain TO-A at 1x10(8)colony forming units (CFU)/g, Clostridium butyricum strain TO-A at 1x10(8)CFU/g and Enterococcus faecalis strain T-110 at 1x10(9)CFU/g were used. Litter weight at delivery and ratio of return to estrous improved significantly (17% and 24% improvement, respectively) by probiotic administration to sows (0.2% (w/w)). Furthermore, the feed intake of the probiotics-administered sows was greater than that of the control sows during the late lactation period. Post-weaning diarrheal incidence and growth performance was improved by probiotics administration to neonates (0.02% (w/w)), while the combined use of probiotics in sows and their neonates induced the enlargement of villous height and prevented muscle layer thinning in the small intestine of weaning piglets. The administration of probiotics of three species of live bacteria improved the porcine reproductive performance around stressful periods of sows (farrowing) and piglets (weaning). [Corrections added on 26 April 2016, after first online publication: Enterococcus faecalis strain T-100' has been corrected to Enterococcus faecalis strain T-110' in the above paragraph and in the Probiotics' section under the Materials and Methods heading.]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据