4.4 Article

Numerical study on the hydrodynamic performance of the semi-spade rudder and propeller

期刊

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1687814018823107

关键词

Semi-spade rudder; turbulence model; KP458 propeller; multi-reference framework; thrust and torque; computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20170540085]
  2. Doctoral Research Funds of Liaoning Province [201601071]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [3132018306]
  4. Educational Reform of Dalian Maritime University [2018Y09, 2017Y05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The semi-spade rudder and KP458 propeller of the KVLCC2 (KRISO very large crude carrier) model tanker are adopted by ITTC maneuvering technical committee in the comparative study of ship maneuverability. The incompressible viscous flow around semi-spade rudder and KP458 propeller is investigated using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, the computational grids are generated using ICEM software, and finite volume method is employed to discretize the governing equations. Combined with turbulence model, the hydrodynamic performance of semi-spade rudder is analyzed at different rudder angles, and the result provides a reference for the estimation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of semi-spade rudder. The multi-reference framework method is employed to carry out the numerical simulation of the flow field around the propeller. The thrust and torque of propeller under different turbulence models are calculated in the simulation. The thrust coefficient curve, torque coefficient curve, and efficiency curve are present. The pressure distributions of the pressure side and suction side of propeller blades are studied at different advance coefficient. Based on the study of the hydrodynamic performance of the semi-spade rudder and propeller, the propeller-rudder interaction is simulated and analyzed at different advance coefficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据