4.0 Review

Live cell imaging of dynamic behaviors of motile cilia and primary cilium

期刊

MICROSCOPY
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 99-110

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfy147

关键词

ciliary beat frequency; time-lapse microscopy; ciliopathies; cilium; differential interference contrast microscopy; primary ciliary dyskinesia

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology [JPMJPR17H1]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology KAKENHI [JP17K07381, JP15H01316, JP15H01207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cilium is a tiny organelle, with a length of 1-10 m and a diameter of similar to 200 nm, that projects from the surface of many cells and functions to generate fluid flow and/or sense extracellular signals from the environment. Abnormalities in cilia may cause a broad spectrum of disease, i.e. the so-called ciliopathies. Multiple imaging approaches have been implemented to understand the structure, motion and function of the tiny cilium. In this review, we focus on the microscopic observations and analyses of the dynamic behaviors of both motile cilia and primary cilium. Motile cilia repeat reciprocal motions at 15-25 Hz with a clear asymmetry of effective and recovery strokes. Observing the fast movement of motile cilia requires a high-speed camera with a frame rate of more than 100 fps. The labeling of cilia tips enables the detailed analysis of the asymmetric beating motion of motile cilia. The primary cilium, which is imagined to be static,' is also dynamic, i.e. it elongates, shrinks and disassembles, although this behavior is quite slower than that of motile cilia. The specific fluorescent labeling of primary cilium and time-lapse imaging are required to observe and analyze the slow behaviors of the primary cilium. We present some approaches, including some tips for successful procedures, in the successful imaging of the dynamic behaviors of motile cilia and primary cilium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据