4.7 Article

Disentangling the Mesoscale Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 124, 期 3, 页码 2164-2178

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JC014628

关键词

mesoscale-air-sea-interactions; current feedback; thermal feedback; scatterometters; coupling coefficients; coupled models

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-1419450]
  2. GENCI-TGCC computing resources GENCI-TGCC [2017-0106895 2018-0106895 A0050107298]
  3. Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE)
  4. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-11-MONU-0010]
  5. FONDECYT [3180472]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-MONU-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the decades, the use of scatterometer data allowed to demonstrate the global ubiquity of the ocean mesoscale thermal feedback (TFB) and current feedback (CFB) effects on surface winds and stress. Understanding these air-sea interactions is of uttermost importance as the induced atmospheric anomalies partly control the ocean circulation and thus can influence the Earth climate. Whether the TFB and CFB effects can be disentangled, and whether satellite scatterometers can properly reveal them, remain rather unclear. Here, using satellite observations and ocean-atmosphere coupled mesoscale simulations over 45 degrees S to 45 degrees N, we show that the CFB effect can be properly characterized and unraveled from that due to the TFB. We demonstrate that the TFB can be unambiguously characterized by its effect on the stress (and wind) divergence and magnitude. However, its effect on the wind and stress curl is contaminated by the CFB and thus cannot be estimated from scatterometer data. Finally, because scatterometers provide equivalent neutral stability winds relative to the oceanic currents, they cannot characterize adequately the CFB wind response and overestimate the TFB wind response by approximate to 25%. Surface stress appears to be the more appropriate variable to consider from scatterometer data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据