4.4 Review

Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty and Management

期刊

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 15-24

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/os.12425

关键词

Bone defects; Knee joint pain; Management; Revision of total knee arthroplasty

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2018JJ3844]
  2. Scientific Research Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province, China [B2019188]
  3. Youth Science Foundation of Xiangya Hospital Central South University [2017Q07]
  4. Postdoctoral Research Program of Xiangya Hospital Central South University [223551]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the recent updates in revision of total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). We reviewed the recent articles on RTKA in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) involves the replacement of all three compartments of the knee in surgery of the knee joint to restore capacity and function. TKA is one of the most common and reliable surgical treatment options for the treatment of knee diseases. However, some patients require revision of TKA (RTKA) after primary TKA for various reasons, including mechanical wear, implant loosening or breakage, malalignment, infection, instability, periprosthetic fracture, and persistent stiffness. Unfortunately, the overall outcome of RTKA is not as satisfactory as for primary TKA due to the uncertainty regarding the actual success rate and the risk factors for failure. Cementation, modular metal augmentation, bone grafting, autologous bone grafting, allogenic bone grafting, impactation bone grafting, structural bone allografting, metaphyseal fixation, using porous titanium coated press fit metaphyseal sleeves and porous tantalum structural cones, and megaprostheses or customized prostheses are the currently available management options for RTKA. However, most of the management systems possess specific complications. Novel approaches should be developed to improve functional capacity, implant survival rates, and quality of life in a cost-efficient manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据