4.6 Article

Prognostic significance of circulating PD-1, PD-L1, pan-BTN3As, BTN3A1 and BTLA in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

期刊

ONCOIMMUNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1561120

关键词

Immune checkpoint; pancreatic cancer; outcome; butyrophilin 3A; programmed cell death-1; programmed cell death ligand-1; B and T lymphocyte attenuator

资金

  1. La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  2. INCa
  3. Canceropole PACA
  4. DGOS (labellisation SIRIC)
  5. Fondation de France
  6. INSERM
  7. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PDAC is one of the most heterogeneous cancers with low chemotherapeutic sensitivity due to a dense stroma, a weak vasculature and significant biological aggressivity. In cancer, suppressive immune checkpoints are often hyper-activated to ensure an effective evasion of tumor cells from immune surveillance. These immune checkpoints include in part, the B7/butyrophilin-like receptors such as butyrophilin sub-family 3A/CD277 receptors (BTN3A), the B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) belonging to the B7-like receptors and the programmed death protein (PD-1) with its ligand PD-L1. We evaluated the plasma level of these markers in 32 PDAC patients (learning cohort) by ad hoc developed ELISA's and showed that there are highly correlated. We used ROC curves and univariate analysis to characterize their prognostic relevance in these patients and showed that their plasma level can serve as survival predictor. Plasma level thresholds that correlate with less than six months survival were established for sPD-1 (>8.6ng/ml), sPD-L1 (>0.36ng/ml), sBTLA (>1.91ng/ml), sBTN3A1 (>6.98ng/ml) and pan-sBTN3A (>6.92ng/ml). These thresholds were applied in independent validation cohort composed by 27 new samples and could efficiently discriminate short versus long PDAC survivors. Our study reveals that monitoring the concentration of soluble forms of inhibitory immune checkpoints in plasma can help predict survival in PDAC patients and therefore improve their treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据