4.8 Article

Climate and litter C/N ratio constrain soil organic carbon accumulation

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 746-757

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz045

关键词

litter carbon-to-nitrogen; wetness index; annual litterfall; soil texture; soil organic carbon

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDA05050000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC41430529]
  3. CAS Distinguished Research Fellow Program
  4. Swedish Research Council, Formas [2015-468]
  5. Swedish Research Council, VR [2016-04146]
  6. Swedish Research Council [2016-04146] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays critical roles in stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentration, but the mechanistic controls on the amount and distribution of SOC on global scales are not well understood. In turn, this has hampered the ability to model global C budgets and to find measures to mitigate climate change. Here, based on the data from a large field survey campaign with 2600 plots across China's forest ecosystems and a global collection of published data from forested land, we find that a low litter carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N) and high wetness index (P/PET, precipitation-to-potential-evapotranspiration ratio) are the two factors that promote SOC accumulation, with only minor contributions of litter quantity and soil texture. The field survey data demonstrated that high plant diversity decreased litter C/N and thus indirectly promoted SOC accumulation by increasing the litter quality. We conclude that any changes in plant-community composition, plant-species richness and environmental factors that can reduce the litter C/N ratio, or climatic changes that increase wetness index, may promote SOC accumulation. The study provides a guideline for modeling the carbon cycle of various ecosystem scales and formulates the principle for land-based actions for mitigating the rising atmospheric CO2 concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据