4.8 Article

Sequence and cultivation study of Muribaculaceae reveals novel species, host preference, and functional potential of this yet undescribed family

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0637-2

关键词

Mouse gut microbiota; Bacterial diversity; Bacteroidetes; Family S24-7; Homeothermaceae; Muribaculaceae; Metagenomic species; Cultivation

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SPP-1656, CL481/2-1, STR1343/1-2, BA2863/5-1]
  2. DFG [CRC-1371, CRC-1182]
  3. Helmholtz Association [VH-NG-933]
  4. Technical University of Munich (TUM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundBacteria within family S24-7 (phylum Bacteroidetes) are dominant in the mouse gut microbiota and detected in the intestine of other animals. Because they had not been cultured until recently and the family classification is still ambiguous, interaction with their host was difficult to study and confusion still exists regarding sequence data annotation.MethodsWe investigated family S24-7 by combining data from large-scale 16S rRNA gene analysis and from functional and taxonomic studies of metagenomic and cultured species.ResultsA total of 685 species was inferred by full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence clustering. While many species could not be assigned ecological habitats (93,045 samples analyzed), the mouse was the most commonly identified host (average of 20% relative abundance and nine co-occurring species). Shotgun metagenomics allowed reconstruction of 59 molecular species, of which 34 were representative of the 16S rRNA gene-derived species clusters. In addition, cultivation efforts allowed isolating five strains representing three species, including two novel taxa. Genome analysis revealed that S24-7 spp. are functionally distinct from neighboring families and versatile with respect to complex carbohydrate degradation.ConclusionsWe provide novel data on the diversity, ecology, and description of bacterial family S24-7, for which the name Muribaculaceae is proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据