4.6 Article

SVC Is a Marker of Respiratory Decline Function, Similar to FVC , in Patients With ALS

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00109

关键词

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; functional outcome; predictor; rate of progression; slow vital capacity

资金

  1. Cytokinetics
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)/Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES) through Fundos do Orcamento de Estado [UID/BIM/50005/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Respiratory function is a critical predictor of survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We aimed to determine if slow vital capacity (SVC) is a predictor of functional loss in ALS as compared to forced vital capacity (FVC). Methods: Consecutive ALS patients in whom respiratory tests were performed at baseline and 6 months later were included. All patients were evaluated with revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) and the respiratory tests, SVC, and FVC. Significant independent variables of functional decay were assessed by univariate Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. A monthly decay not exceeding 0.92 in ALSFRS was considered as the time event. Results: We included 232 patients (134 men; mean onset-age 59.1 +/- 11.23 years; mean disease duration from first symptoms to first visit: 14.5 +/- 12.9 months; 166 spinal and 66 bulbar onset). All variables studied declined significantly between the two evaluations (p < 0.001). FVC and SVC were strongly correlated at study entry (r(2) = 0.98, p < 0.001) and FVC and SVC decays between first evaluation and 6 months after were the only significant prognostic variables of functional decay (p < 0.001). Conclusion: FVC and SVC decay are inter-changeable in predicting functional decay in ALS. Pharmacological interventions reducing the decline rate of FVC and SVC can have a positive impact on the global functional impairment, with relevant implications for clinical trials' design and interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据