4.8 Article

Revisiting Primary Particles in Layered Lithium Transition-Metal Oxides and Their Impact on Structural Degradation

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800843

关键词

layered lithium transition-metal oxide; lithium-ion batteries; mechanical cracks; primary particles; transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017R1A2B3011629, NRF-2015R1A5A1037627]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science, Materials Science and Engineering Division [DESC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered lithium transition-metal oxide materials, e.g., Li(Ni1-x-yCoxMny)O-2 (NCM) and Li(Ni1-x-yCoxAly)O-2, are the most promising candidates for lithium-ion battery cathodes. They generally consist of approximate to 10 mu m spherical particles densely packed with smaller particles (0.1-1 mu m), called secondary and primary particles, respectively. The micrometer- to nanometer-sized particles are critical to the battery performance because they affect the reaction capability of the cathode. Herein, the crystal structure of the primary particles of NCM materials is revisited. Elaborate transmission electron microscopy investigations reveal that the so-called primary particles, often considered as single crystals, are in fact polycrystalline secondary particles. They contain low-angle and exceptionally stable special grain boundaries (GBs) presumably created during aggregation via an oriented attachment mechanism. Therefore, this so-called primary particle is renamed as primary-like particle. More importantly, the low-angle GBs between the smaller true primary particles cause the development of nanocracks within the primary-like particles of Ni-rich NCM cathodes after repetitive electrochemical cycles. In addition to rectifying a prevalent misconception about primary particles, this study provides a previously unknown but important origin of structural degradation in Ni-rich layered cathodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据