4.8 Article

Predicting Operational Stability for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Exciplex Cohosts

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201802246

关键词

degradation mechanisms; exciplex cohosts; molecular stability analysis; organic light-emitting diodes

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0401004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51625301, U1601651, 51573059, 91233116]
  3. 973 Project [2015CB655003]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2016B090906003, 2016TX03C175]
  5. Foundation of Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201504010012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) employing exciplex cohosts have gained attractive interest due to the promising high efficiency, low driving voltage, and potential low cost in future solid-state lighting sources and full-color displays. However, their device lifetime is still the most challenging weakness and rarely studied, which is regarded as a time consuming and complicated work. Therefore, a simplified but effective and comprehensive approach is demonstrated to give prediction for the exciplex cohosts operating lifespan and analyze their possible degradation mechanisms by considering molecular dissociated activation energy with internal exciton dynamics correlations. As a consequence, strong chemical bond stability for the hole transport moieties and rapid reactive exciton relaxation have the intrinsic talent to access potentially long-lived exciplex cohosts, achieving an extended lifetime of 10169 h for the predicted long-lived exciplex cohost OLEDs. Degradation behaviors further confirm that the deteriorated source is attributed to the formation of exciton quenchers and hole traps from excited states and charged-excited states, respectively. The current findings establish a universal technique to screen the stable exciplex cohost candidates with economic time consumption and expenses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据