4.7 Article

Root growth dynamics inside and outside of soil biopores as affected by crop sequence determined with the profile wall method

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 847-856

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-015-1032-1

关键词

Soil biopore creation; Root length; Wheat; Fodder cropping; Subsoil

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) [DFG-FOR 1320]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Taprooting crop species are capable of creating soil biopores (> 2 mm in diameter) in the subsoil due to their large root size and deep-rooting habit. The aim of this study was to quantify root growth dynamics of wheat in the subsoil during its complete growth season as affected by crop sequence. Temporal observation on root length (km m(-2)) of wheat inside and outside of biopores at four growth stages (tillering, booting, anthesis, and milk) was conducted by using the profile wall method under the two crop sequence treatments involving two precrops, viz., chicory and tall fescue. Frequency of biopore presence measured on vertical profile walls depended on the choice of precrops in which chicory precrop resulted in higher frequency (2.3 %) compared with tall fescue (1.5 %). Root length of wheat measured inside biopores was significantly higher when grown after chicory (0.024 km m(-2)) in comparison to tall fescue (0.006 km m(-2)). On average, root length outside biopores after growing chicory was 45.9 % higher than tall fescue until the stage of anthesis. We conclude that at the site under study biopores as pathways for rapid root growth into deeper soil layers allow roots to re-enter and explore the subsoil. Thus, cereals cultivated in rotation with taprooted crops can draw benefit from enhanced uptake of water and nutrients from deeper soil layers during early growth stages. Model simulations with various abiotic and biotic factors will be helpful to reveal the direct evidence of biopore-root-shoot relationship in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据