4.5 Article

Experimental Characterization of Acoustic Streaming in Gradients of Density and Compressibility

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.024018

关键词

-

资金

  1. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) EC-FP7/2007-2013, REA [609405]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2016-04836]
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [ICA16-0002]
  4. Crafoord Foundation [20180837]
  5. Vinnova [2016-04836] Funding Source: Vinnova
  6. Swedish Research Council [2016-04836] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  7. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [ICA16-0002] Funding Source: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Suppression of boundary-driven Rayleigh streaming has recently been demonstrated for fluids of spatial inhomogeneity in density and compressibility owing to the competition between the boundary-layer-induced streaming stress and the inhomogeneity-induced acoustic body force. To understand the implications of this for acoustofluidic particle handling in the submicrometer regime, we here characterize acoustic streaming by general defocusing particle tracking inside a half-wavelength acoustic resonator filled with two miscible aqueous solutions of different density and speed of sound by adjusting the mass fraction of solute molecules. We follow the temporal evolution of the system as the solute molecules become homogenized by diffusion and advection. The acoustic streaming is suppressed in the bulk of the microchannel for 70-200 s, depending on the choice of inhomogeneous solutions. From confocal measurements of the concentration field of fluorescently labeled Ficoll solute molecules, we conclude that the temporal evolution of the acoustic streaming depends on the diffusivity and the initial distribution of these molecules. Suppression and deformation of the streaming rolls are observed for inhomogeneities in the solute mass fraction down to 0.1%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据