4.7 Article

Influence of Graphene Oxide on the Mechanical Properties, Fracture Toughness, and Microhardness of Recycled Concrete

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano9030325

关键词

graphene oxide; recycled aggregate concrete; mechanical property; fracture toughness; microhardness; microstructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878364, 51578297, 51878366]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2017ZC0737, ZR2018MEE043]
  3. National 111 project (China)
  4. Taishan Scholar Priority Discipline Talent Group program - Shandong Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a constant drive to improve the properties of recycled concrete owing to its inferior strength and fracture toughness compared to normal concrete and recent progress in graphene oxide (GO) nanomaterials impelling nanosized reinforcements to recycled concrete. Here, GO-modified natural sand (NS)- or recycled sand (RS)-based mortars (GONMs or GORMs) with six GO fractions (w(GO)s) were fabricated to explore their 28 d mechanical strengths (f(t)(28), f(c)(28)), fracture toughness (K-IC, delta(c)), and microhardness (H-v), as well as their crystal phases (using X-ray powder diffraction) and microstructures (using scanning electronic microscopy). Results reveal, greater enhancements in mechanical strengths (4.50% and 10.61% in f(t)(28), 4.76% and 13.87% in f(c)(28)), fracture toughness (16.49% and 38.17% in K-IC, 160.14% and 286.59% in delta(c)), and microhardness (21.02% and 52.70% in H-v) of GORM with just 0.025 wt parts per thousand and 0.05 wt parts per thousand GO, respectively, with respect to the control are achieved when comparing with those of GONM with the same w(GO). More zigzag surfaces, more irregular weak interface slips, and the relatively lower strengths of RS bring the superiority of the template and reshaping effects of GO into full play in GORM rather than in GONM. These outcomes benefit a wide range of applications of recycled concrete products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据