4.3 Article

Evaluation of phosphate removal from aqueous solution using metal organic framework; isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic study

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40201-019-00341-6

关键词

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs); ZIF-67; Adsorption; Phosphate; RSM; Thermodynamic

资金

  1. Ilam University of Medical Science, Iran [974001-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPhosphate (PO43-) is the main etiological factor of eutrophication in surface waters. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are novel hybrid materials with amazing structural properties that make them a prominent material for adsorption.MethodsZeolitic imidazolate framework 67 (ZIF-67), a water stable member of MOFs, with a truncated rhombic dodecahedron crystalline structure was synthesized in aqueous environment at room temperature and then characterized using XRD and SEM. PO43- adsorption from synthetic solutions using ZIF-67 in batch mode were evaluated and a polynomial model (R-2: 0.99, R-adj(2): 0.98, LOF: 0.1433) developed using response surface methodology (RSM).ResultsThe highest PO43- removal (99.2%) after model optimization obtained when ZIF-67 dose, pH and mixing time adjusted to 6.82, 832.4mg/L and 39.95min, respectively. The optimum PO43- concentration in which highest PO43- removal and lowest adsorbent utilization occurs, observed at 30mg/L. PO43- removal eclipsed significantly in the presence of carbonate. The equilibrium and kinetic models showed that PO43- adsorbed in monolayer (q(max): 92.43mg/g) and the sorption process controlled in the sorption stage. Adsorption was also more favorable at higher PO43- concentration, according to the separation factor (K-R) graph. Thermodynamic parameters (minus signs of G degrees, H degrees of 0.179 KJ/mol and S degrees of 44.91 KJ/mol.K) demonstrate the spontaneous, endothermic and physisorption nature of the process.ConclusionHigh adsorption capacity and adsorption rates, make ZIF-67 a promising adsorbent for PO43- removal from aqueous environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据