4.5 Article

Cu2S-Cu3P Nanowire Arrays Self-Supported on Copper Foam as Boosting Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201800993

关键词

electrocatalysts; hydrogen evolution; nanowire arrays; self-supported structures; stability

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21872040]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2016GXNSFCB380002]
  3. Nanning Science and Technology Project [20171107]
  4. Hundred Talents Program of Guangxi Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid electrochemical development of hydrogen evolution, the search for low-cost and high activity electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution has received extensive attention. The fabrication of self-supported Cu2S-Cu3P nanowire (Cu2S-Cu3P NW) arrays on a commercial copper foam by a liquid-solid reaction and subsequent phosphatation at low temperature is reported. The corresponding scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results indicate that the Cu2S-Cu3P NW arrays have a dense nanowire (NW) structure with sulfur and phosphorous uniformly distributed on the surface of the nanowires. Interestingly, the Cu2S-Cu3P NW arrays act as a hydrogen-evolving cathode that when operated in 1.0 m KOH electrolyte only require a low overpotential of 158 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) and show a small Tafel slope of 45 mV dec(-1). The activity decrease is negligible after holding at -500 mA cm(-2) for 75 h, which thus demonstrates excellent stability. This could be due to the structure of nanowire arrays and synergistic effects between S and P, which could increase the specific surface area, reduce the charge transfer resistance, facilitate mass diffusion and electron transfers, and increase the active sites. This work therefore provides a simple method to prepare low-cost and self-supported electrocatalysts with high catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据