4.5 Article

Engineering of Hierarchical and Three-Dimensional Architectures Constructed by Titanium Nitride Nanowire Assemblies for Efficient Electrocatalysis

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 2208-2214

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201900252

关键词

durable support; energy conversions; fuel cells; three-dimensional architectures; transition metal nitrides

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21805104]
  2. PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018 A030310514]
  3. Educational Commission of Guangdong Province [2017KQNCX064]
  4. Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province
  5. Weifang Science and Technology Development Plan Project [2018GX108]
  6. Open Experimental Project of Shandong Peninsula Engineering Research Center of Comprehensive Brine Utilization [2018 LS017]
  7. Doctoral Fund Project of Weifang University of Science and Technology [2017BS11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocatalysts that exhibit both, high performance and durability are essential for the promotion and commercialization of energy conversion devices. Transition metal nitrides (TMNs) hold great potential in many electrochemical catalytic processes, whereas the rational syntheses of highly open and three-dimensional titanium nitride-based nanostructures through a facile and efficient strategy is still a challenge. Herein, a scalable and effective method is proposed for the rational synthesis of mono-or bi-metallic titanium nitride with three-dimensional urchin-like porous structures, which exhibit high electrochemical stability and structure durability. When being used as the support, the resultant electrocatalyst possesses much higher activity and durability in oxygen reduction reaction as well as methanol oxidation reaction. This work provides a general approach for the rational design of TMN-based electrocatalysts or devices for application in energy conversion and storage technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据