4.6 Review

A Comprehensive Review on Catalytic Oxidative Desulfurization of Liquid Fuel Oil

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal9030229

关键词

hydrodesulfurization; oxidative desulfurization; refractory sulfur compounds; model fuel oil

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) of Korea [NRF-2017R1A2B4009340]
  2. R&D Program of Forest Science Technology by the Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute) [2017052C10-1819-BB02]
  3. Korea Forestry Promotion Institute (KOFPI) [2017052C10-1819-BB02] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of green fuel oil is of the utmost importance for maintaining a healthy life and environment in the current world. Effective and complete removal of sulfur refractory compounds (such as 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene and other alkyl-substituted thiophene derivatives) from fuel oil is essential to meet the new requirements of sulfur standards. Several techniques have been proposed for desulfurization of fuel oil, such as hydrodesulfurization (HDS), selective adsorption, extractive distillation, biodesulfurization, and oxidative desulfurization (ODS). The removal of sulfur by the HDS process requires higher investment costs, high reaction temperature (up to 400 degrees C), and high pressure (up to 100 atm) reactors. On the other hand, studies have shown that the ODS process is remarkably successful in the removal of sulfur under mild reaction conditions. This review article presents a comparative analysis of various existing catalytic oxidation techniques: acetic acid/formic acid catalytic oxidation, heteropolyacid (HPA) catalytic oxidation, ionic liquid catalytic oxidation, molecular sieve catalytic oxidation, polyoxometalates catalytic oxidation, titanium catalytic oxidation, and ultrasound-assisted oxidation systems, as well as discusses research gaps, and proposes important recommendations for future challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据