4.5 Article

Male same-sex pairing as an adaptive strategy for future reproduction in termites

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 179-187

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.007

关键词

colony fusion; cooperation; homosexual behaviour; insects; same-sex sexual behaviour

资金

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Kiban Kenkyu S Grant [25221206]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [15J02767]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J02767] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wide variety of animals display same-sex behaviours, including courtship, copulation and pairing. However, these behaviours create a paradox, as selection seemingly acts on maladaptive traits, and they have often been regarded as cases of mistaken identity, especially in invertebrates. We show that termite males show nest establishment and pairing formation that usually occur in monogamous colony foundation and demonstrate how this contributes to their fitness. We found that pairs of male dealates stopped searching for females and established nests without females, although single males rarely ceased searching for mates. Males in these male-male pairings had much higher survival than single males. Our colony fusion experiment showed that a male in a surviving same-sex pair can replace a male in an incipient colony and produce offspring. A mathematical model demonstrated that the observed strategy of establishing a male-male pairing instead of searching for females is advantageous when the risk of predation is high, even when colony fusion is very rare. These results indicate that, under certain ecological conditions, a cooperative same-sex pairing with a potential rival for reproduction can be adaptive. Our study implies the existence of various possibilities for explaining the adaptive significance of same-sex sexual behaviours. (C) 2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据