4.5 Article

Surface CH3NH3+ to CH3+ Ratio Impacts the Work Function of Solution-Processed and Vacuum-Sublimed CH3NH3PbI3 Thin Films

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201801827

关键词

electronic structure; methylammonium lead triiodide; photoelectron spectroscopy; physical evaporation; solution synthesis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0205002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [U1432106]
  3. 111 Project of the Chinese State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science & Technology (NANO-CIC)
  5. DFG [SFB951]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CH3NH3PbI3 thin films are fabricated using several representative synthesis methods such as spin-coating, evaporation, and a combination of the two. These methods, which frequently occur in reported literatures, use the same precursors PbI2 and CH3NH3I but differ in how the two are mixed. It is found that the latter plays a vital role in determining the surface morphology, composition, and grain size of the films, even when the same stoichiometric ratio of the precursors is used. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals that the amount of CH3+-type defects, which results from CH3NH3I dissociation, is sensitive to both the physical state of CH3NH3I and the order of mixing sequence. The variation of the CH3NH3+:CH3+ ratio also affects the valence band and the work function of the corresponding films, as revealed by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. Furthermore, the energy-level alignment between the perovskite film and a model hole transport layer, N,N '-di(1-naphthyl)-N,N '-diphenylbenzidine (NPB) is examined. It is found that the CH3NH3+:CH3+ ratio correlates with the offsets between the valence band maximum of perovskite film and the highest occupied molecular orbital of NPB as well, and the energy-level alignment with the dual-source, coevaporated CH3NH3PbI3 film is most suitable for efficient hole transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据