4.6 Article

Highly Efficient Deep Blue Aggregation-Induced Emission Organic Molecule: A Promising Multifunctional Electroluminescence Material for Blue/Green/Orange/Red/White OLEDs with Superior Efficiency and Low Roll-Off

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 767-+

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01724

关键词

deep blue; aggregation-induced emission; host; hybrid WOLEDs; superior efficiency; low roll-off

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21788102, 51333007, 91433201, 11661131001]
  2. Guangzhou Science AMP
  3. Technology Plan Project [201707020040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the constant demand of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) with high efficiency, long lifetime, and low cost for display and lighting applications, the development of high-performance organic electroluminescence materials is key. Aggregation-induced emission (AIE) luminogens (AIEgens) provide a promising choice for their excellent performance in nondoped devices. Here we report a multifunctional deep blue AIE material, which can be used not only as an excellent blue emitter but also as a good host of green/orange/red phosphors. A deep blue nondoped OLED with a CIEy of 0.08 and high external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 7.0% is achieved. Furthermore, a series of green/orange/red phosphorescent OLEDs with high efficiency and low roll-off are obtained. Impressively, hybrid white OLEDs (WOLEDs) based on the deep blue AIEgen exhibit simultaneously high CRI (>90), excellent efficiency (EQE(max) > 25%, PEmax = 99.9 lm W-1 for two-color WOLEDs, PEmax = 60.7 lm W-1 for four-color WOLEDs), low roll-off (PE1000nit = 72.1 lm W-1 for two-color WOLEDs, PE1000nit = 43.5 lm W-1 for four-color WOLEDs), and superior stable color, indicative of the multifunction of AIEgens. Accordingly, this work opens a new direction for achieving high-performance OLEDs, particularly offering a smart but simple way to depress the efficiency roll-off and reduce the cost of OLEDs for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据