4.7 Article

Functional EEG connectivity in infants associates with later restricted and repetitive behaviours in autism; a replication study

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-019-0380-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [642990]
  2. Birkbeck Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (ISSF)
  3. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) [115300]
  4. EFPIA companies
  5. UK Medical Research Council [G0701484, MR/K021389/1]
  6. BASIS
  7. MRC [G0701484, G9715587, G0600977, MR/K021389/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a replication study of our prior report that increased alpha EEG connectivity at 14-months associates with later autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis, and dimensional variation in restricted interests/repetitive behaviours. 143 infants at high and low familial risk for ASD watched dynamic videos of spinning toys and women singing nursery rhymes while high-density EEG was recorded. Alpha functional connectivity (7-8 Hz) was calculated using the debiased weighted phase lag index. The final sample with clean data included low-risk infants (N = 20), and high-risk infants who at 36 months showed either typical development (N = 47), atypical development (N = 21), or met criteria for ASD (N = 13). While we did not replicate the finding that global EEG connectivity associated with ASD diagnosis, we did replicate the association between higher functional connectivity at 14 months and greater severity of restricted and repetitive behaviours at 36 months in infants who met criteria for ASD. We further showed that this association is strongest for the circumscribed interests subdomain. We propose that structural and/or functional abnormalities in frontal-striatal circuits underlie the observed association. This is the first replicated infant neural predictor of dimensional variation in later ASD symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据