4.6 Article

Balancing Tourism's Economic Benefit and CO2 Emissions: An Insight from Input-Output and Tourism Satellite Account Analysis

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11041052

关键词

tourism; CO2 emissions; input-output (IO); tourism satellite account (TSA); Beijing

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Outstanding Young Scholars (NSFC) [71622011]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71301006]
  3. construction project of Collaborative Innovation Center of e-Tourism of Beijing [822139917160102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To balance tourism's economic benefit and environmental pollution, this paper proposes an analytical approach by using the input-output (IO) model and tourism satellite accounts (TSA). Four steps are taken: (1) the setting of system boundaries according to the combined IO and TSA database; (2) economic benefit estimation for tourism income, sectoral multipliers and inter-sector linkages; (3) environmental pollution estimation of direct and indirect CO2 emissions; and (4) a policy analysis to balance the economic benefit and CO2 emissions (in terms of reducing the CO2 emissions intensity) in tourism-related sectors. In the case of Beijing, some interesting insights can be obtained. Beijing's tourism sectors experienced a fast economic growth and a clear decrease in CO2 emissions during 2007-2012, with the former having a greater absolute change rate (particularly for the shopping and sightseeing sectors). In all tourism sectors (except for transportation), the indirect CO2 emissions were over three times greater than the direct CO2 emissions. Transportation was a leading contributor to both the economic benefit (representing 91.65% of tourism income in 2012) and to environmental pollution (representing 38.75% of tourism-related CO2 emissions). The detailed findings regarding the industrial and energy structures offer insightful policies for a high-benefit and low-emissions development of tourism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据