4.4 Article

Association of Delirium Response and Safety of Pharmacological Interventions for the Management and Prevention of Delirium A Network Meta-analysis

期刊

JAMA PSYCHIATRY
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 526-535

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4365

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 106-2314-B-039-027-MY3, 106-2314-B-038-049, 106 -2314 -B -039-031, 106-2314-B-039-035, 105-2918-I-039-001, 104-2314-B-039-022-MY2, 104-2314-B-039-050-MY3]
  2. National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan [NHRI-EX105-10528NI]
  3. Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, Taiwan [CRS -106-063, DMR-107-202, DMR-107-204, DMR-107-091, DRM-107-097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE Although several pharmacological interventions for delirium have been investigated, their overall benefit and safety remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate evidence regarding pharmacological interventions for delirium treatment and prevention. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, ClinicalKey, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 17, 2018. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining pharmacological interventions for delirium treatment and prevention. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS To extract data according to a predetermined list of interests, the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines were applied, and all meta-analytic procedures were conducted using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were treatment response in patients with delirium and the incidence of delirium in patients at risk of delirium. RESULTS A total of 58 RCTs were included, in which 20 RCTs with 1435 participants (mean age, 63.5 years; 65.1% male) compared the outcomes of treatment and 38 RCTs with 8168 participants (mean age, 70.2 years; 53.4% male) examined the prevention of delirium. A network meta-analysis demonstrated that haloperidol plus lorazepam provided the best response rate for delirium treatment (odds ratio [OR], 28.13; 95% Cl, 2.38-333.08) compared with placebo/control. For delirium prevention, the ramelteon, olanzapine, risperidone, and dexmedetomidine hydrochloride groups had significantly lower delirium occurrence rates than placebo/control (OR, 0.07; 95% Cl, 0.01-0.66 for ramelteon; OR, 0.25; 95% Cl, 0.09-0.69 for olanzapine; OR, 0.27; 95% Cl, 0.07-0.99 for risperidone; and OR, 0.50; 95% Cl, 0.31-0.80 for dexmedetomidine hydrochloride). None of the pharmacological treatments were significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with placebo/control. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This network meta-analysis demonstrated that haloperidol plus lorazepam might be the best treatment and ramelteon the best preventive medicine for delirium. None of the pharmacological interventions for treatment or prophylaxis increased the all-cause mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据